top of page
Writer's pictureMichelle Hayman

From Lares to Angels: Tracing Pagan Roots

Updated: 4 days ago

Today, we delve into the intriguing world of ancient Roman religion, exploring the worship of the Lares, their role in Roman spiritual life, and the fascinating parallels between invoking their protection and certain practices within the Roman Catholic tradition, such as prayers to "saints", and "angels" for safeguarding. We’ll also touch on the darker aspects of ancient Roman religious customs, including the chilling practice of human sacrifices made to the god Jupiter.


The Lares: Guardians of Roman Households and Communities

The Lares were central figures in Roman religious life, revered as protective deities of households, families, and communities. Deeply ingrained in both private and public worship, these spirits held a significant place in the spiritual and cultural fabric of ancient Rome. While their worship initially focused on safeguarding homes and lands, their role expanded to include protection of the city and crossroads, symbolizing their broader guardianship over Roman life.


Lares as Genii or Jinn: Protective Spirits

The Lares were closely linked to the concept of genii (smokeless fire spirits), spiritual entities believed to act as guardians or protectors. Each individual, family, or place was thought to have its own genii—a personal spirit or essence that safeguarded and influenced their well-being. In this sense, the Lares can be seen as genii of the household and community, offering a tangible connection between the material and spiritual worlds.

Interestingly, this idea bears similarities to the concept of jinn in Middle Eastern traditions. Jinn, like genii, are spiritual entities associated with specific places or people, capable of influencing their surroundings for good or evil. These are the same spirits honored today in practices such as Voodoo, Santeria, and Lucumi.


The fiery spirits of Lares, Genii or Jinn

The Role of the Lares in Roman Life

Guardians of the Household

The primary role of the Lares was to guard the household and its members. Families would dedicate altars, known as lararia, to these deities within their homes. These altars, often placed in prominent areas such as the entrance or main living space, served as focal points for daily rituals and offerings. The Lares Familiares, as they were called in this context, were integral to domestic life, providing protection, prosperity, and harmony to the family.

Rituals conducted at the lararium often included offerings of food, wine, and incense. These daily acts of devotion reinforced the family’s spiritual connection to the Lares and ensured their continued favour. The presence of the Lares was believed to foster a sense of security, grounding the household in divine protection.


Sacraria and the Lararium: Altars to the Lares

The altars dedicated to the Lares were central to their worship, serving as physical symbols of their presence and power. These shrines, known as lararia, were intricately designed and often included statues or paintings of the Lares alongside other household deities. Families would gather before the lararium to perform rituals and prayers, embedding the Lares deeply into the rhythm of daily life.

In addition to lararia, there were also sacraria, small shrines dedicated to various deities or spirits. The term Sacraria Argeorium suggests a connection to rural or agricultural practices, reflecting the Lares’ early role as protectors of the land and fields. These shrines may have been placed in gardens or near fields, emphasizing the Lares’ guardianship over not just the household but also the productivity and fertility of the land.


Religious Significance of the Lares

The Lares were not just household spirits; they embodied a sacred role within Roman religion. Their presence extended beyond physical protection, symbolizing the divine essence that permeated daily life. For the Romans, the Lares were intermediaries between the human and divine realms, ensuring that their prayers and offerings reached the gods.

The Lares’ association with genii further underscores their spiritual importance. As genii were considered the essence or spirit of a person or place, the Lares represented the collective soul of the household or community. This dual role—both individual and communal—highlighted their unique position within Roman spirituality.


It’s important to reiterate that praying to dead humans as saints in the RCC serves no purpose, as they cannot hear prayers or intercede on behalf of Catholics—they are not divine. This raises a critical question: who are Catholics truly praying to? The concept of Lares, Genii, or Jinn as intermediaries between the earthly and spiritual realms bears a striking resemblance. Could it be that Catholics are, in reality, encouraged to pray to entities like the Lares from ancient Roman religion, now rebranded under the guise of "saints"? According to Scripture, saints are living true believers in Christ, and no human can be sanctified by a pope—that is the sole work of God. This suggests that the RCC may be following a gospel that diverges from biblical truth.


Praying to Angels: A Parallel to Spirit Worship

Praying to angels for protection or intercession within Catholic practice bears a striking resemblance to invoking spirits in other traditions, an act Scripture consistently warns against. Throughout the Bible, angels clearly state that they are not to be venerated or worshipped. In Revelation 22:8-9, John falls at the feet of an angel to worship him, but the angel rebukes him, saying, "See thou do it not: for I am thy fellowservant... Worship God." This directive underscores that even angels, as powerful messengers of God, reject any actions that elevate them to divine status or treat them as intermediaries deserving of prayer or devotion.

Yet, Catholic practices surrounding angels—such as prayers, feast days, and statues—can resemble the way spirits are revered in other religious systems. Prayers like the “Angel of God” or the “Prayer to St. Michael” directly address angels, asking them for protection or intercession. These prayers, while not officially deemed worship, involve seeking assistance from spiritual beings, a practice that mirrors how spirits are invoked for guidance or favor in animistic or polytheistic traditions.

Furthermore, the use of statues, altars, and icons depicting angels like St. Michael in homes and churches can give the impression of spirit veneration. Lighting candles, leaving offerings, or kneeling before such images to pray may appear indistinguishable from practices in other religions where spirits or deities are honoured. This focus on angels as central figures in rituals, rather than directing prayers solely to God, raises questions about whether these actions align with biblical commands.

Theological study of angels, known as angelology, also underscores their significant role in Catholic life. Angels are viewed as messengers, protectors, and intermediaries, often invoked in times of need. However, from a biblical perspective, relying on angels for guidance or protection risks placing them in a role reserved for God alone. By addressing angels directly and attributing such a prominent role to them in spiritual life, the line between honouring them as servants of God and elevating them as spiritual mediators becomes blurred.

The biblical warnings are clear: angels are fellow servants in God’s plan, not spiritual beings to whom prayers should be directed. Practices that elevate their importance or seek their intercession mirror those of spirit worship, a deviation from the biblical mandate to direct all worship, prayer, and reliance to God alone. This raises a vital question: are these practices rooted in Scripture, or do they reflect traditions that have strayed into the territory of invoking spirits under a different guise?


Rome: Great Bronze Quadriga on top of the Palace of Justice

Honoring the Spirits of the Dead: The Veneration of the Manes in Ancient Rome

In ancient Roman religion, the veneration of the dead was a deeply ingrained practice, reflecting the culture's profound respect for the afterlife and ancestral spirits. This reverence is epitomized in the phrase “Diis Manibus,” which translates to “To the Divine Spirits” or “To the Spirits of the Dead.” Found commonly on Roman tombstones, this dedication was directed toward the manes, the spirits or souls of the deceased, particularly those of ancestors. It bears a striking resemblance to how today, the RCC promotes praying to deceased saints.

The manes held a significant place in Roman spiritual life. They were believed to protect the living, acting as guardians over their descendants and ensuring the continued prosperity of the family. By dedicating tomb inscriptions with the phrase Diis Manibus, the Romans acknowledged the enduring influence and presence of these spirits. This inscription would often be followed by the name of the deceased, personalizing the dedication, such as “Diis Manibus, Gaius Julius,” which would mean “To the divine spirits of Gaius Julius.”

These tomb inscriptions were not merely markers of identity but also served a religious purpose. They symbolized the ongoing bond between the living and the dead, ensuring that the spirits of the ancestors were honoured appropriately. Rituals and offerings accompanied these dedications, often including food, drink, or incense left at gravesites. Such acts were believed to secure the favor of the manes, ward off misfortune, and maintain harmony between the realms of the living and the dead.

The phrase Diis Manibus also underscores the Roman belief in the divine nature of the departed. By referring to the deceased as “divine spirits,” Romans elevated their ancestors to a semi-divine status, reflecting a culture deeply connected to its lineage and history. This practice highlights the intersection of religion and family in Roman life, where devotion to the gods (plural) extended naturally to devotion to one's forebears.

Through the phrase Diis Manibus and the rituals surrounding it, the Romans demonstrated their respect for the afterlife and their belief in the continuing presence of the departed in the world of the living. This practice of honouring the dead reveals much about the Roman worldview—one that sought to maintain harmony between the mortal and spiritual realms, ensuring protection, guidance, and prosperity for those left behind.


Why Venerating the Dead is Unchristian

The practice of venerating the dead, as seen in ancient Roman religion, is fundamentally unchristian and has no scriptural basis. The elevation of ancestors or deceased individuals to a role of spiritual guardianship or intermediaries reflects pagan traditions rather than biblical teachings. Christianity teaches that only God is to be worshipped, and all intercession must come through Christ alone. Any attempt to involve the spirits of the dead in religious practices undermines this truth and aligns more closely with Roman customs like the veneration of the manes.

Ancient Roman religion was polytheistic. The Romans worshipped a vast array of gods and goddesses, each associated with different aspects of life, nature, and society. This polytheistic framework was highly flexible, allowing for the incorporation of new deities and religious practices from conquered peoples, making it both expansive and adaptable. This cultural openness allowed practices such as the veneration of the manes to flourish, embedding a belief system that relied on the ongoing influence of spirits and multiple divine entities.

Scripture explicitly warns against such practices. Deuteronomy 18:10-11 condemns consulting with the dead or engaging in necromancy, labeling these actions as abominations before the Lord. Furthermore, the Bible consistently emphasizes that the dead cannot intercede for the living; only Christ has the authority to mediate between humanity and God (1 Timothy 2:5). Unlike pagan traditions that rely on maintaining connections with the deceased, Christianity asserts that the souls of the departed are in God’s hands, beyond human interaction or influence.

The troubling resemblance between ancient Roman practices and some modern traditions—such as prayers to saints—further highlights the divergence from biblical teaching. Just as the Romans sought protection and favour from the spirits of their ancestors, modern practices that encourage devotion to the deceased mirror these unbiblical customs. By doing so, they risk perpetuating ancient pagan ideas under a different guise, diverting focus from God and His divine authority.

True Christian worship is centered on God alone. The adoption of practices that involve the dead, whether rooted in ancient Roman religion or modern traditions, strays from Scripture and compromises the foundational principles of faith. These actions ultimately detract from the worship of the Creator, aligning instead with traditions that have no place in biblical Christianity.


Human Sacrifice to Jupiter: A Gruesome Offering in Times of Crisis

The practice of human sacrifice in ancient Rome, particularly during times of war or national crisis, reveals the depths of their religious devotion and the lengths they were willing to go to appease the gods. While human sacrifice may not have been a daily occurrence, Rome’s frequent wars and periods of instability made such extreme rituals a recurring reality.

The Romans believed their success in war and governance depended on maintaining favor with the gods. When calamity struck—whether it was military defeat, a plague, or ominous signs—the state turned to extraordinary measures. Human sacrifices were among these, and the god Jupiter, the supreme deity of the Roman pantheon, was often the focus of such offerings. These sacrifices were carried out with the belief that they could avert disaster and restore divine favor.

The Decemviri Sacris Faciundis, a group of ten priests tasked with interpreting the Sibylline Books, played a pivotal role in these rites. The Sibylline Books were believed to contain divine instructions, consulted during times of great crisis. If these texts recommended human sacrifice, the Decemviri had the authority to carry out the ritual. For example, after the Gallic sack of Rome in 390 BCE, two Gauls and two Greeks were sacrificed under the Decemviri’s guidance to stabilize the city’s shaken faith and security.

During the Second Punic War (218–201 BCE), when Rome faced devastating defeats at the hands of Hannibal, human sacrifices were performed again. Two children were reportedly sacrificed following instructions from the Sibylline Books, reflecting the Romans' desperation to turn the tide of war. These acts, though extreme, were deemed necessary in the context of Rome’s survival.

Human sacrifices were not limited to children or random victims. They often involved prisoners of war or foreigners, symbolizing a life offered to protect the Roman state. This ritual act carried profound symbolism, representing the ultimate plea for divine intervention to save the Republic. While animal sacrifices were the norm, human offerings served as a last resort in moments of extreme peril.

Rome’s constant warfare, driven by both expansionist ambitions and defensive necessities, made such crises relatively frequent. Each defeat or disaster was interpreted as a sign of divine displeasure, prompting the state to seek appeasement through sacrifices. Though human sacrifice was not an everyday ritual, it occurred often enough in Rome’s history to demonstrate the deep connection between religion, politics, and war.

The focus on Jupiter as the recipient of these sacrifices is significant. As the king of the gods and the deity of justice and authority, Jupiter embodied Rome’s ideals of power and stability. Offering human lives to him symbolized the ultimate act of devotion, a grim acknowledgment of the belief that the state’s survival outweighed individual life.


Flamen Dialis, offering incense to Jupiter, King of the pagan gods

The Role of the Flamen Dialis and Its Deeper Implications

The Flamen Dialis was the high priest of Jupiter in ancient Roman religion, serving as the earthly representative of the god. The title derives from Latin, where Flamen means "priest" and Dialis refers to Jupiter, the king of the Roman gods, also known as Dies, or the sky god. This prestigious position underscored Jupiter’s central role in Roman religion and reflected the deep integration of religious and political authority in ancient Rome.

As Jupiter’s representative on earth, the Flamen Dialis was responsible for performing sacred rituals and sacrifices to secure the god’s favor. The Romans believed that Jupiter’s protection was essential for the state’s stability and prosperity, particularly during times of crisis or war. The Flamen Dialis lived a life entirely dedicated to Jupiter, bound by strict rules of ritual purity.

The symbolism of the Flamen Dialis extended beyond his role as a religious figure. He embodied Rome’s relationship with Jupiter, the city’s protector and supreme deity. This bond was not limited to personal devotion but also reflected the broader integration of Jupiter’s worship into Roman civic life. The selection of the Flamen Dialis was a highly regulated process, overseen by the pontifex maximus, or chief priest. His wife, the Flaminica Dialis, shared in his sacred duties, and their marriage itself was considered a religious institution, further emphasizing the divine nature of his role.

Jupiter’s association as the sky god, ruling over thunder, lightning, and the heavens, evokes a troubling connection to Christ’s description of Satan as the “prince of the power of the air” in Ephesians 2:2. This parallel suggests that the figure of Jupiter, celebrated as the supreme deity in Roman religion, may in fact align with the biblical adversary of God. The similarities are striking, as both Jupiter and Satan are depicted as wielding authority and dominion over earthly and celestial realms.

Charles Chiniquy, a former Catholic priest, sheds further light on this connection in his book Fifty Years in the Church of Rome. He argues that the Roman Catholic Church has merely repackaged the worship of heathen Rome under a Christian guise, claiming that modern Rome is no different from its pagan predecessor. Chiniquy asserts that the RCC continues to worship Jupiter, now disguised as Christ. This perspective becomes particularly thought-provoking when considering the historical role of the Flamen Dialis as Jupiter’s representative on earth, mirroring the way the pope is regarded as Christ’s vicar in Catholic tradition.

The position of the Flamen Dialis, with its strict rules, symbolic significance, and role as Jupiter’s earthly representative, underscores the centrality of Jupiter worship in ancient Rome. However, the parallels between Jupiter’s dominion as the sky god and Satan’s description in Scripture, combined with Chiniquy’s claims about the continuity of Roman religious traditions, invite serious reflection. These connections raise questions about the deeper spiritual implications of these practices and their influence on modern religious structures.

Comments


Commenting has been turned off.
bottom of page